Serological Evidence and Self-Reported Outcomes in Patients with Adrenal Insufficiency During The First Waves of COVID-19 in the North- East Italy

Background: East during COVID-19 is a potentially serious and fatal new infection that first broke out in Italys North Eastduring Spring 2020. Among subjects considered more clinically vulnerable, patients with adrenal insufficiency (AI) have a known increased risk of infections, that could lead to poor prognosis and death due to adrenal crisis. Even the psychological and sociooccupational impact of COVID-19 could affect the health of AI patients, requiring a dynamic and continuous adaptation of the daily glucocorticoid (GC) therapy. Aim(s): To investigate if AI patients have a higher risk for COVID-19 infection than the general population, all residents in the red zone Veneto, in North-East Italy. Moreover, based on a purpose-built ADDI-COVID questionnaire, the study aimed to evaluate the subjective perception of an increased risk for COVID-19 infection and pandemic-related psycho-social impact, working life and self-adjustments of GC therapy. Method(s): Open-label, cross-sectional monocentric study on 84 (65 primary and 19 secondary) AI patients, all resident in Veneto, followed-up at the Endocrinology Unit, University-Hospital of Padua, for at least 3 years, in good and stable clinical conditions. At the end of the first COVID-19 wave (by August 2020), all patients underwent serological investigation of anti-SARS-CoV2 IgG and ADDI-COVID questionnaire. All AI patients enrolled were contacted during March-April 2021 to evaluate eventual COVID-19 infection occurrence after the second and third waves, completing a follow-up period of about 12 months. Result(s): All AI patients resulted negative to the serological test for anti-SARS-CoV2 IgG at the end of the first wave of COVID-19. After the second and third pandemic waves, COVID-19 infection occurred in 8 (10%) patients, and none needed intensive care or hospitalization. Half patients felt an increased risk of COVID-19 infection, significantly associated with an increased stress (p = 0,009) and the consequent increase of GC stress-dose (p = 0,002). Only one patient reported adrenal crisis stress correlated. The great majority of the 61 (73%) worker patients changed their working habits during the lockdown, which was inversely related with COVID-19-related stress (p = 0,0015). A significant association was found between workers and endocri- nologist contact (p= 0,046) since 18 among 20 AI patients who contacted the endocrinologist were workers. Discussion and Conclusion(s): Patients with AI residence in Veneto did not show a higher incidence of COVID19-infection compared with general population residents in Veneto after the first pandemic waves. However, the perception of increased COVID- 19 infection risk significantly impacted the psychological well-being, working habits and GC daily doses of AI patients. Especially during this pandemic period, therapeutic patient education was crucial to prevent and treat situations or conditions that could lead to an adrenal crisis. The endocrinologic consultation could help to strengthen the awareness of AI patients, especially if they were workers.

Managing the menopause during the pandemic

The structure of the presentation will be 1) Pandemic-Epidemiology 2) General Pandemic-Management 3) HRT and COVID 4) Different spectrum of menopausal symptoms (Europe/Asia) 5) Different risks lead to different HRT. 1) Pandemic-Epidemiology: SARS-COVID-19 has got to be a new disease, China was the first to suffer from the pandemic starting in December 2019 with spread all over the world. Diagnosis, treatment and protective measures have started in Europe in March 2020;up from autumn 2022 in Europe the pandemic changed to endemic, but protective measures still should be continued in risk patients like in hospitals and nursing homes. Rehabilitation will for long-time be an issue like treatment of "Post-" and "Long-COVID". China pursued a zero-COVID-policy until Dec 2022. The sudden stop of almost all measures led to a sharp increase in infections, which shows that the disease will remain a global risk. 2) General Pandemic-Management: Protective measures like vaccination, surgical masks, screening/testing, isolation management, travel/residence history in high-risk regions, education of patients and families had to be the first priority, ahead of other issues such as the management of menopause. 3) HRT and COVID: Already the first prelimary data assessed in Wuhan/China have shown that women with low estradiol-levels had more severe infections with COVID. An analysis of health records of 68,466 COVID-positive patients from 17 countries showed that the fatality risk for women > 50 years receiving HRT was reduced by more than 50% compared to those women not taking HRT (Seeland, 2020). Likewise from a case-control study analyzing the self-reported data of 1.6 million UK menopausal women through the COVID-Symptoms Study Smartphone application (control populations adjusted for age, body mass index, and smoking status) was concluded, that HRT not only can be used, but even can protect from COVID-infections and/or their sequelae (Costeira, 2021). 4) The different spectrum of menopausal symptoms (independent of COVID-infections) comparing data in Europe (showing more vasomotor symptoms) and China (more somatic symptoms) will be presented, including own data. 5) Different risks during HRT consequently lead to different use of HRT, especially more transdermal estrogen combined with progesterone in Europe due to much higher VTE-risk, but more management of the high bleeding-problems in China using individualized (mostly oral) estrogen/progestogen combinations. Copyright © 2023

Haematuria and proteinuria associated with COVID-19-mRNA-vaccination: a case-report

Objective: A new generation of vaccine technology platform has been developed to combat the COVID- 19 pandemic, the mRNA vaccine. The EMA granted the Pfizer- BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine an emergency use authorization in December 2020 with limited clinical experience, especially in the pediatric population. Method(s): Here, we present a case-report of a 17-yearold girl, who was vaccinated with the mRNA-COVID vaccine in October 2021, and developed a gross hematuria and proteinuria the day after the vaccination. Result(s): The patient presented at our outpatient clinic three days after the vaccination with new-onset hematuria and proteinuria. Up to this date, she had no former known medical conditions and the family history was negative regarding kidney diseases. We excluded nephrolithiasis, autoimmune glomerulonephritis and urinary tract infection as causes. The laboratory chemistry of the kidney was within normal range. The proteinuria dissolved spontaneously, and a microhematuria persisted. One day after the second dose of Cominarty in November 2021, the gross hematuria with proteinuria relapsed. A treatment with an ACE-inhibitor did not have any effect on the proteinuria. At this point, only a few casereports of patients with a comparable clinical course, especially from Japan, were published. In suspicion of a vaccine-triggered nephritis we started a prednisolon therapy which dissolved the proteinuria and induced a regression of the haematuria to a minimal stage. Conclusion(s): Within the last year, the medical community has gained more insights concerning mRNA vaccines. There is growing evidence, that mRNA vaccines can trigger de novo or relapse IgA nephropathy. But more systematic research and long-term evaluation is desirable to elucidate the underling pathophysiology as well as the influence on kidney survival of affected patients in the future. Furthermore, patient education should incorporate the risk of hematuria and proteinuria in children when applying mRNA vaccines.

Community outreach and engagement to increase colorectal cancer screening in ethnic minority communities

PURPOSE: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is preventable with screening, yet remains the second leading cause of cancer deaths in the U.S. Nationally, CRC screening substantially declined during the COVID-19 pandemic and is underutilized by ethnic minorities and in safety-net systems. Therefore, City of Hope partnered with Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) and community and faithbased organizations to improve CRC screening among medically underserved communities. METHOD(S): Between October 2020 and October 2022, we implemented a multi-component intervention that included community outreach and education (a multi-ethnic multimedia campaign and community training adapted from the NCI Screen2Save (S2S) program) and clinic-based interventions (provider/staff training and patient education). Intervention reach and training participant surveys were assessed. Within our four FQHC sites, we also compared clinic-level CRC screening rates among age-eligible patients before (June 2021) and after implementation of the clinic-based intervention (June 2022). RESULT(S): Our reach assessment showed that our multi-ethnic multimedia campaign reached 35.4 million impressions, our S2S education training reached 300 diverse community members, and our provider/staff training reached 150 medical providers. Among the 100 providers surveyed, >80% felt confident they could get their patients to complete their CRC screening test and follow-up care. For the clinic-based intervention component, our baseline sample included 11,259 age-eligible patients across the four FQHC sites. Overall CRC screening rates increased from 45% to 52% before vs. after the intervention implementation period. The site with the highest CRC screening rate (>62%) maintained steady rates over the observation period, whereas three sites with lower baseline rates showed greater pre-post improvements (average 15 percentage-point increase). CONCLUSION(S): An overall increase in CRC screening rates was achieved across FQHCs, despite clinic staffing challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic. Intervention implementation is ongoing with attempts to document individual, clinic improvements by race/ethnicity.

Innovations in Diabetes Device Training: A Scoping Review.

OBJECTIVE: The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic highlighted a pre-existing need for alternatives to traditional in-person diabetes device trainings. Barriers to care, which include the heavy burden of training, pose a threat to optimal adoption and utilization of these devices. We searched the literature for alternative methods of training, evaluated user satisfaction, and compared short-term clinical outcomes with guideline-based glucometric targets and historical training results. METHODS: A scoping review of Embase articles from 2019 to 2021 was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines using key words relevant to diabetes technologies. Original full-text articles investigating training of new users on devices were included. Titles and abstracts were screened for eligibility by 2 independent reviewers, and results were summarized. RESULTS: Of 25 articles retrieved from the database, 11 met the criteria. Alternative training strategies included video conferencing, phone calls, mobile applications, and hybrids with traditional trainings. Overall, there was a high degree of user satisfaction with virtual visits, with a preference for hybrid approaches (6 articles). Although glucometrics varied between articles, short-term glucometrics were satisfactory overall (8 articles), including improved glycated hemoglobin measurements and time in range. Two articles compared time in range over various time points after traditional and remote training. One found equivalency, and the other identified a 5% improvement with remote training. CONCLUSION: Alternative training approaches are a viable option to reduce the barriers to care and to alleviate training burden. Intentional implementation of alternatives should be considered a solution to address current barriers.

An Evaluation of the Quality of COVID-19 Internet Resources for Cancer Patients.

Cancer patients may face difficulty evaluating web-based COVID-19 resources in context with their cancer diagnosis. The purpose of this study is to systematically evaluate educational resources available for cancer patients seeking online information on COVID-19 and cancer. The term "COVID-19 and Cancer" was searched in Google and metasearch engines Yippy and Dogpile. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, the results from the 3 lists were systematically combined for a final ranked list. This list was analyzed using a validated structured rating tool with respect to accountability, interactivity, organization, readability, and content coverage and accuracy. Three hundred ninety-eight websites were identified, and 37 websites were included for analysis. Only 43% of sites disclosed authorship, 24% cited sources, and 32% were updated within 3 months of the search date. Fifty-four percent of websites had high school readability (8.0-12.0), 43% were at university level or above, and no websites demonstrated the recommended reading level for health information for the public (< 6.0). Topics most discussed were special considerations for cancer patients during COVID-19 (84%) and COVID-19 risk factors (73%). Topics least covered were COVID-19 incidence/prevalence (5%) and prognosis (8%). There is some COVID-19 information for cancer patients available online, but quality is variable. Healthcare professionals may direct cancer patients to the most reliable COVID-19 and cancer websites shown in this study and results may be helpful when designing future online health information resources.

Feasibility of a Virtual Educational Programme for Behaviour Change in Cardiac Patients from a Low-Resource Setting.

Patient education is an integral part of recovery from a critical cardiac life event and a core component of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programmes. This study addressed the feasibility of a virtual educational programme for behaviour change in CR patients from a low-resource setting in Brazil. Cardiac patients from a CR programme closed due to the pandemic received a 12-week virtual educational intervention (WhatsApp messages and bi-weekly calls from healthcare providers). Acceptability, demand, implementation, practicality, and limited efficacy were tested. Overall, 34 patients and 8 healthcare providers agreed to participate. The intervention was considered practical and acceptable by the participants, who reported a satisfaction median of 9.0 (7.4-10.0)/10 (patients) and 9.8 (9.6-10.0)/10 (providers). The main difficulties in carrying out the intervention activities were related to technology, motivation to self-learning, and a lack of in-person orientation. All the patients reported that the information included in the intervention was aligned with their information needs. The intervention was associated with changes in exercise self-efficacy, sleep quality, depressive symptoms, and performance of high-intensity physical activity. In conclusion, the intervention was considered feasible to educate cardiac patients from a low-resource setting. It should be replicated and expanded to support patients that face barriers to onsite CR participation. Challenges related to technology and self-learning should be addressed.

The effect of a video-based COVID-19 paediatric patient education on state anxiety in children with suspected COVID-19 admitted to hospital.

BACKGROUND: Anxiety causes the long-term psychological impacts on children during the pandemic. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to reduce anxiety in paediatric patients and increase their adherence to treatment through a video-based COVID-19 paediatric patient education. METHODS: This quasi-experimental study with pretest-posttest single group was carried out in a research hospital's COVID-19 Paediatric Emergency Area in Turkey between May and August 2020. The sample consisted of 128 children aged between 4 and 12 years. RESULTS: In the study, it was found that 50.8% of the children who came to the COVID- 19 Paediatric Emergency Area due to suspicion of COVID-19 were boys and their mean age was 8.54 ± 2.62. 21.1% of the children were hospitalised before and 73.4% were afraid of the hospital. State stress scores of the participants before the patient education were higher in those, who didn't attend school between ages of 4-10, than those who went to school. State stress mean scores of the children from all age groups decreased significantly after the education. CONCLUSIONS: The video-based paediatric patient education decreases the children's hospital-related anxiety during the pandemic and increased their adherence to treatment.

Knowledge About Preventive Health Guidelines for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases in Patients: A Quality Improvement Project

Introduction: Preventive care guidelines for patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) emphasize the need for a patient-centered interdisciplinary approach, with assessment and management of the patient's physical and mental health as well as the IBD. There is no data about compliance with current IBD preventive care guidelines in Puerto Rico. This study aims to evaluate current IBD preventive care in the clinic, and knowledge among patients and gastroenterologists about the preventive care guidelines. The 3-phase study includes retrospective medical record review, an anonymous online survey of gastroenterologists, and an anonymous survey of patients. We report the results of the patient survey. Method(s): Adult patients with an established diagnosis of at least 6 months of ulcerative colitis (UC), Crohn's disease (CD) or indeterminate colitis (IC), were recruited from the IBD Clinics and through IBDrelated social media. Questionnaires were filled in the clinic and online using Google forms. Statistical analysis was performed using descriptive statistics. Comparisons of proportions and means between groups was based on Fisher's exact and chi square tests. The study was approved by the MSC IRB. Result(s): 83 patients completed the survey, 42 from the clinics and 41 through social media. 60% had CD, 47.4% were diagnosed more than 10 years ago, 57.9% were younger than 38 years old and 68% were on immunosuppressants/biologics. 83.13% and 60.24% of patients knew that COVID and Influenza vaccines were indicated, respectively. However only 42.17%, 36.14%, 32.53% and 31.33% of patients knew about indications for HPV, pneumococcal, varicella and zoster vaccines, respectively. There was a significant difference about knowledge regarding screening for latent TB (p=0.019), anxiety and depression (p= 0.03) and smoking status (p=0.033) between CD and UC/IC patients, as shown in Table. Conclusion(s): Our study showed a significant lack of knowledge about IBD preventive care in patients. Strategies to improve patient education are needed. The results of the review of records from the clinic as well as the knowledge of gastroenterologists will point out other deficiencies in the healthcare system and help design methods to improve patient care. Another aspect that needs to be explored is access to preventive measures such as vaccines. (Table Presented).

Developing Multidisciplinary Models of Care in Rheumatology at University College London Hospital: 18 Months of Learning from Conception to Delivery and Beyond

Background/Aims The COVID-19 pandemic has placed unprecedented pressures on NHS departments, with demand rapidly outstripping capacity. The British Society for Rheumatology 'Rheumatology Workforce: a crisis in numbers (2021)' highlighted the need to provide innovative ways of delivering rheumatology specialist care. At University College London Hospitals (UCLH) we created a rheumatology multidisciplinary team (MDT) clinic to meet rising demands on our service. The aims of the Rheumatology MDT clinic were to: reduce new appointment/follow-up waiting times, increase clinic capacity, incorporate musculoskeletal (MSK) point of care ultrasound, reduce number of hospital visits and add value to each clinic encounter. Methods We ran a 6-month pilot, supported by our outpatient transformation team, incorporating a Rheumatology Advanced Practice Physiotherapist (APP), Clinical Nurse Specialist (CNS) and MSK ultrasound within a Consultant clinic. The success of the pilot helped secure funding for a further 12 months. Over 18 months we have implemented: APP/Consultant enhanced triage - up to 40% of referrals were appropriate for APP assessment, including regional MSK problems and back pain. This increased capacity for consultant-led appointments. Standardisation of time-lapse between CNS and consultant follow-up appointments to ensure appropriate spacing between patient encounters. Facilitated overbooking of urgent cases afforded by additional capacity provided by the APP. MSK ultrasound embedded in the clinic template. 'Zoom' patient education webinars facilitated by MDT members and wider disciplines e.g. dietetics, to empower self-management and reduce the administrative burden of patient emails/phone calls occurring outside the clinic. Patient participation sessions and feedback to help shape the service. Results During the 6-month pilot we reduced our waiting time for follow-up appointments from 9 months to 2. We now have capacity to book 1-2 urgent cases each week. Pre-MDT the average wait from consultant referral to physiotherapist appointment was 55 days. The MDT allows for same day assessment (reducing 2-3 patient journeys a clinic) and where suitable, facilitates discharge or onwards referral to the appropriate service. A dedicated MDT CNS has shortened treatment times, reduced email traffic between CNS and consultant and allows for same day, joint decision-making resulting in fewer appointments. Zoom webinar feedback has been positive. Patients value the broad expertise of allied health professionals which supports self-management. Embedding ultrasound allows for same day diagnostics, decreased referrals to radiology and reduced hospital visits. Conclusion Our MDT model has reduced waiting lists, decreased treatment delays and cut hospital attendances. Point of care ultrasound allows for same day decision making and abolishes the cost and diagnostic delay associated with referrals to radiology or outsourced providers. Shared decision-making adds value to outpatient attendances, which is reflected in patients' positive feedback. The MDT model maximises the existing workforce skill set by enhancing the APP and CNS role, allowing patients immediate access to their expertise.

Online Mdt Patient Education for Early Inflammatory Arthritis

Background/Aims Patient education in early inflammatory arthritis (EIA) promotes understanding and engagement with treatment, empowering patients to use self-management in their long-term health condition. It is embedded in national guidance and audit. Individual appointments are time consuming, and groups sessions became impossible during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our education sessions have evolved to a monthly online meeting which aims to be engaging, effective and time efficient. Methods Face-to-face group education afternoons were previously embedded into our early arthritis pathway. Presentations and opportunities for questions were given by a rheumatology consultant, nurse, physiotherapist, podiatrist and occupational therapist. Sessions lasted 2 hours and local charity representatives attended. Group education sessions completely stopped with the COVID-19 pandemic restrictions. This successful MDT model was moved to a monthly Microsoft Teams meeting and condensed to 1 hour. Sessions continue to consist of five short presentations, introduction to charity representatives and opportunity for questions. Following the session, all patients received links to videos of the talks for future reference, contact details for the MDT and local charities, and a link to download our local rheumatology self management app. Patients who are unable to attend also receive this content by email. Patient feedback was gathered through an online questionnaire. Results Attendance has increased over time with 75% of our new EIA patients now attending each month. Feedback from 16 patients rated 75% of all talks as extremely useful or useful. 89% are interested in attending future meetings. 93% had already used or plan to use our rheumatology self management app. Positive patient feedback included: ''the whole team were brilliant giving advice and answering questions'', ''nice to see the specialists' faces, and to get the feeling they really cared'', and ''a perfectly sensible and productive way to introduce all the options for help and support''. Some patients did not feel confident to ask questions in the meeting. Email and telephone advice lines were signposted. Attendance was increased by 40% by a short telephone reminder of the appointment. Conclusion An online meeting has proven to be a time efficient and effective way of providing multidisciplinary education and introducing self management. A short time investment from each MDT member gives breadth to the education. Inviting all newly diagnosed early arthritis patients and encouraging attendance by a short telephone call has maximised reach. Ensuring all patients are sent presentation videos to re-watch and the self referral details further facilitates self management. The format could easily be adapted to other patient education events.

Patient Experience of Remote Healthcare during the Pandemic in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Adult Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

Background/Aims COVID-19 challenged traditional care models and necessitated introduction of remote consultations. We wanted to understand the experiences of people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA)/adult juvenile idiopathic arthritis (AJIA) on accessing healthcare remotely, and how well people understood their condition and treatment. Methods This collaborative work between the National Rheumatoid Arthritis Society (NRAS) and clinicians in Oxford led to the development of an electronic questionnaire that was disseminated in July 2021 for four weeks through e-newsletters and all NRAS social media platforms. Those living in the UK with RA and AJIA aged 18 and over were eligible. Analyses of data were performed in Microsoft Excel and IBM SPSSv28. Results We analysed 316 responses. There was a middle-aged (ages 46 to 54, 54.1%, n=171), Caucasian (97.5%, n=306), female (92.4%, n=292) preponderance. Most had RA (93%, n=294) followed by another inflammatory arthritis (4.1%, n=13) and AJIA (2.8%, n=9). The majority had their condition for >10 years (43.4%, n=137) but some were diagnosed <12 months ago (3.2%, n=10). Two thirds of participants (66.5%, n=210) did not know their DAS28 score. Of the remaining third, the most commonly reported measure was moderate disease activity (12%, n=38). Those with higher self-reported DAS28 scores were using analgesia more regularly (p<0.01) but we found no difference in NSAID, DMARD or steroid use. Age did not influence steroid usage (p=0.35), but those who had their condition for longer used more steroids and regular analgesia. Only 33.9% (n=107) of responders felt their condition had been managed adequately in the pandemic, with more reporting poor status (40.8%, n=129) rather than good (16.8%, n=53). Those living in the South of England reported statistically better disease control than those from the North, despite having more virtual assessments (p=0.02). Travelling and fear of Covid appeared more important than consultation skills. Just over a fifth (20.3%, n=64) felt greater focus should be given to patient concerns. Of the 9.1% of patients (n=29) with a new diagnosis made during the pandemic, 24.1% (n=7) unable to book a GP appointment easily. Patients experienced a median symptom time of 4-10 weeks before consulting GPs. Once assessed, 31% (n=9) were referred immediately while the median time was 4-8 weeks. We found 58.6% (n=17) of patients received their diagnosis within their initial rheumatology consultation and 76.5% (n=13) of these started a DMARD immediately. Conclusion Despite a greater emphasis on patient education and PROMs influencing clinical decision-making, it is staggering that two-thirds did not know their DAS28 score. Analgesia and steroid use were common in patients with well-established disease which remains a concern. Accessing appointments was a significant barrier to patients and delays in care were experienced at every step in the NHS management pathways. Remote consultations need greater emphasis on patient concerns.

Initiating Home Parenteral Nutrition Therapy in a Patient at High Risk of Refeeding Syndrome After COVID-19 Infection

Background: An emerging finding about COVID-19 is its effect on nutrition and weight loss. The COVID-19 symptoms of fatigue, altered taste or smell, and lack of appetite are well known. But COVID-19 may have a more profound effect on clinical nutrition status. Two recent studies have identified that approximately one-third of ambulatory COVID-19 patients are at risk of experiencing weight loss >= 5% (Anker, et al;di Filippo, et al). The case study presented here discusses home start total parenteral nutrition (TPN) in a patient recently diagnosed with COVID-19 at high risk for refeeding syndrome. Method(s): N/A Results: Case Study: A 92-year-old patient was diagnosed with COVID-19 on June 8, 2022. Over the next week, she was hospitalized twice to manage symptoms of acute mental status changes, lethargy, aphasia, hypotension, and loss of appetite. The patient received nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, remdesivir, and bebtelovimab to treat COVID-19 at different times between June 9, 2022, and June 18, 2022. She remained COVID positive and continued to deteriorate clinically. On June 20, 2022, the patient began receiving 24/7 homecare, including intravenous (IV) fluids of dextrose 5% in normal saline (D5NS) 1000 mL daily for three days. She continued to experience loss of appetite and had no bowel movement for 3 days. On June 23, 2022, she was referred to this specialty infusion provider to initiate TPN therapy in the home setting. The patient's BMI was 18.2 kg/m2. Lab results revealed potassium 3.0 mmol/L, phosphate 1.6 mg/dL, and magnesium 1.6 mg/dL. High risk of refeeding syndrome was identified by the level of hypophosphatemia and hypokalemia. The specialty infusion provider's registered dietitian recommended to discontinue D5NS and begin NS with added potassium, phosphate, and magnesium. Thiamine 200mg daily was added to prevent Wernicke's encephalopathy. The patient's clinical status and lab values were monitored closely each day until her electrolyte levels stabilized (Table 1). Home TPN therapy was initiated on June 28, 2022, with <10% dextrose and 50% calorie requirement with 85% protein and 1.0 g/kg lipids. Three-day calorie count and nutrition education were performed four days post TPN initiation. Oral intake met only 25% of estimated needs. Over several days, theTPN formula was gradually increased to goal calories and the infusion cycle was slowly decreased. The following week, the patient's oral intake improved to 60%-75% of estimated needs. Her constipation resolved, and she showed improvement in functional status and mobility. Her appetite drastically improved when the TPN was cycled. Another three-day calorie count was performed when TPN calories reached goals. Oral intake demonstrated 100% estimated calorie and protein needs. TPN therapy was ultimately discontinued on July 14, 2022. As of September 30, 2022, the patient has stabilized at her pre-COVID weight of 45 kg with full recovery of appetite, function, and cognition. Discussion(s): The ASPEN Consensus Recommendations for Refeeding Syndrome (da Silva, et al) describe the repletion of electrolyte levels before introducing calories to prevent end-organ damage associated with refeeding syndrome (respiratory muscle dysfunction, decreased cardiac contractility, cardiac arrhythmias, and encephalopathy). Conclusion(s): This case study highlights the successful initiation of home TPN therapy in a patient at high risk of refeeding syndrome post COVID-19 infection. Although home start TPN and the risk of refeeding syndrome are not new concepts, they must be considered in the setting of COVID-19. Given the effects COVID-19 has on taste, smell, and appetite and the recent finding that one-third of patients with COVID infection may experience weight loss of >= 5%, nutrition support and patient education are vital components of overall patient care. (Figure Presented).

'Forgotten issue': Living and caring for people with chronic breathlessness

Introduction: Breathlessness is a common symptom in clinical practice and in many prevalent diseases including chronic obstructive lung disease (COPD), asthma, heart failure, lung cancers and post COVID-19 syndrome. Understanding patients' experience of living with breathlessness, their expectations of care and self-management needs is essential to support development of health services and resources that meet their needs. Aim(s): To explore the perspectives of patients and their careers, on living with chronic breathlessness, provision and quality of medical care, and accessing information and resources to assist self-management. The study also explored their views on three evidence-based breathlessness patient education materials (PEMs). Method(s): Qualitative study involving in-depth semi-structured interviews with 16 patients living with chronic breathlessness (>=2 weeks) and their careers. Topics explored included: (1) experience living with breathlessness;(2) current medical care experience and their expectations;and (3) self-management resources, needs and views on some current publicly available PEMs. Result(s): Fourteen patients (cardiac, respiratory, and non-cardiorespiratory) and two carers (50% female) were interviewed (mean age 57 years). Twelve main themes were identified - (1) Breathlessness controls their lives, (2) Breathlessness avoidance and the vicious cycle, (3) Coping vs Fatalism, (4) Feeling misunderstood by their surroundings and health providers, (5) Diagnostic delays, misdiagnosis, and knowledge gaps, (6) Discontinuity of care, (7) Focus on pharmacologic management of breathlessness, (8) Demand for choice, non-pharmacologic options and support, (9) Beyond curing disease: symptom relief and improving quality of life as a goal, (10) Being more aware and in control of their disease, (11) Self-management and limited support for it, and (12) Resources they would value. Conclusion(s): Breathlessness remains a neglected condition in Australia. Patients suffer from lack of clinician and community awareness, discontinuity of care, and too few clinical and self-management options.

Characteristics and correlates of disease-related knowledge and exercise self-efficacy among cardiac patients attending virtual cardiac rehabilitation during the first COVID-19 lockdown in Peru

Background Government responses and restrictions due to the COVID-19 pandemic (e.g., limits to non-urgent health care services, including non-urgent outpatient appointments) led to the suspension of center-based (in-person) cardiac rehabilitation (CR), with many programs switching to virtual delivery. This study aimed to understand the characteristics and correlates of disease-related knowledge and exercise self-efficacy in a group of patients attending a virtual CR program during the first COVID-19 lockdown in Peru. Methods In this prospective observational study, 240 patients receiving virtual CR care (exercise instructions and patient education) between August/2020 and December/2021 completed questionnaires pre- and post-CR assessing disease-related knowledge (CADE-Q SV questionnaire) and self-efficacy (SE;Bandura's Exercise SE scale). Paired t tests were used to investigate changes pre/post-CR and Pearson correlation coefficients were used to determine the association between knowledge/SE and patients' characteristics. Results Participants were mainly comprised of men, with a cardiac diagnosis of stable coronary artery disease, who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention or had a known diagnosis of hypertension and with at least one cardiovascular risk factor (95.8%). Mean total knowledge scores improved significantly at post-CR (12.9±2.4 to 15.6±2.0/20;p<0.001), as well as in 4/5 knowledge areas (cardiovascular risk factors, exercise, nutrition, and psychosocial risk;p<0.001). Mean SE scores improved significantly at post-CR (1.9±0.9 to 3.0±0.9/5;p=0.01). Post-CR knowledge and SE were significantly correlated with cardiac diagnosis and surgical procedures (r=0.17, p =0.02 and r=0.27, p=0.02, respectively). Conclusions The virtual CR program improved disease-related knowledge and SE of cardiac patients during the first months of the COVID-19 pandemic. Post-CR outcomes were correlated with cardiac diagnosis and surgical procedures and more research with other characteristics is warrantied.

Developing Contemporary Survivorship Clinic for Recipients of Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: A Single Center Experience

Introduction: Survival after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) has improved tremendously over the last few decades. HCT survivors are at increased risk of long-term complications and secondary cancers. This poses unique challenges to the HCT-related healthcare system given the growing need for survivorship care. Developing a HCT survivorship program with a dedicated clinic to survivors ensures equitable access to care and ongoing patient education. Herein, we describe our program survivorship model and our initial experience. Method(s): The Moffitt Cancer Center (MCC) survivorship clinic (SC) planning committee was initiated in September 2019. The SC was launched in January 2021 with the mission to provide high-quality, comprehensive, and personalized survivorship care and to empower patients and community health care providers with education and a roadmap for screening for late effects. The SC initially focused on allogeneic (allo) HCT patients and later opened to autologous (auto) HCT recipients in February 2022. HCT patients are referred by primary HCT team after HCT with an emphasis on preferred timeframe of initial SC visit no earlier than 3 months but less than 12 months from HCT. SC is located at 2 physical locations: main campus and satellite, with virtual visit options to account for the distance from MCC and COVID considerations. SC applies a consultative model. SC is staffed by dedicated advanced practice professional (APP), supervised by SC faculty. The scope of SC care includes but is not limited to prevention of infections (education, vaccinations), surveillance of late effects (endocrine, pulmonary function, cardiac, bone health), and general cancer screenings (breast, colon, skin cancer). Patients' clinical data from SC inception to August 2022 were reviewed. Result(s): From January 2021 to August 2022, a total of 138 patients were seen in SC. The majority were seen in person (62% in clinic, 38% by virtual visit). Median age was 58 years (range, 19-82). Median time to first SC visit was 21 months (range, 3-1464) after HCT. Allo HCT was the most common type of HCT seen in clinic (87%, n=120). Most common diagnoses were acute myeloid leukemia (43%, n=59), myelodysplastic syndrome (17%, n=23), and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (10%, n=14). Only 17 patients (12%) were seen in 2021 but the volume increased significantly in 2022. Currently there are more than 10 patients seen in SC per month. Conclusion(s): We report successful experience in launching a contemporary HCT SC despite the challenges of an ongoing COVID pandemic. As a stand-alone cancer center, we serve a wide geographical location with subspecialty and primary care providers dispersed throughout the community. Our consultative model and experience could provide a useful guide for other programs. In 2023, we plan to expand our SC to a broader population of patients receiving other cellular immunotherapies.Copyright © 2023 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy

Self-management interventions for people with pulmonary fibrosis: A scoping review

Introduction/Aim: Self-management is considered important in people with pulmonary fibrosis (PF);however, components of self-management that are relevant to PF are not well defined. This study aimed to identify the common self-management components used in PF. Method(s): A scoping review was conducted according to the Joanna Briggs Institute Manual for Evidence Synthesis. The protocol was registered with Open Science Framework database (doi: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/EUZ6S). A systematic search was conducted on August 16, 2022, using five electronic databases (Medline, Embase, PsychInfo, CINAHL and the Cochrane central register of controlled trials). Search results were screened and studies were included if they (i) described any educational, behavioural and support components that aimed at facilitating self-management;(ii) involved adults with PF;and (iii) employed quantitative, qualitative or mixed methods. Two researchers performed record screening and data extraction independently followed by discussions of discrepancies. Result(s): Of the 27081 records screened, 87 studies were included (39% observational studies, 26% randomised controlled trials). The most common self-management components were patient education (78%), information or support for managing physical symptoms (66%) and enhancing psychosocial wellbeing (54%). Majority of the included studies (71%) were rehabilitation programs with evidence of self-management training such as home exercise program and breathing training. Other studies included palliative care programs consisting of components such as patient education and care goal setting (12%), support programs for managing medication (4%), home-based self-monitoring training (4%), disease management programs (4%), mindfulness-focused stress reduction program (1%), telemedicine service delivered during the COVID-19 outbreak that included strategies to prevent infections and self-monitoring of clinical parameters (1%) and PF-specific educational and support website (1%). Over half of the interventions were provided by a multidisciplinary team. Conclusion(s): This review identified the common components used to promote self-management in PF. These findings help to guide the development of optimal interventions to support self-management in PF.

Online Content About Prenatal Tdap Vaccination Using Reddit

Purpose of Study The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported in 2017 that only 50.4% of pregnant women received the Tdap vaccination to protect their newborns from pertussis;21.7% were unaware they needed it and 18.3% were concerned about adverse effects on their baby. This study investigated common concerns women expressed online regarding Tdap in pregnancy and assessed accuracy of online content using Reddit, a popular discussion website. Methods Used We used Reddit's built-in search engine to find user-generated posts by searching key words related to Tdap vaccination in pregnancy. Using the same keywords, we also searched commonly appearing subreddits, which are online communities within Reddit dedicated to topics. Working backwards from February 29, 2020 (to avoid COVID issues), we evaluated posts and comments that met the following inclusion criteria: posts from U.S. users with at least 10 comments;posts and comments focused on Tdap in pregnancy. Comments from automated bots or users outside the U.S. were excluded. Using the idea of saturation, Reddit posts with over 50 comments were analyzed until the 50th comment or until 4 subthemes were found. The CDC guidelines were used to judge accuracy. Summary of Results 100 Reddit posts with 2872 comments between February 2020 to October 2018 were included in the study. 74 Reddit posts sought advice on Tdap vaccination, safety/side effects, and who need Tdap. Out of the 2872 comments, 115 contained inaccurate content;96% of those related to the recommended frequency of the pertussis vaccination. Common themes within the comments included: cocooning (a strategy to protect infants by vaccinating close contacts);why and when pregnant women should get Tdap;and side effects. The most prevalent subtheme pertained to visitation rules for those who declined Tdap. Few comments reflected more extreme opinions, such as 'only illegal immigrants have pertussis.' Conclusions Although most pregnant women on Reddit support the recommendation for Tdap in pregnancy, some users report inconsistent information received from their clinicians. Confusion still remains about who should receive Tdap. There is potential for improved patient education provided by clinicians to ensure their pregnant patients have accurate and complete information about Tdap.

Accessing care during the pandemic: A UK wide survey of people with rheumatoid arthritis and adult juvenile inflammatory arthritis during the COVID-19 pandemic.

COVID-19 drastically changed healthcare delivery models for rheumatology services. We sought to understand the impact of these changes for patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and adult Juvenile Inflammatory Arthritis (AJIA) in established patients and those newly diagnosed during the pandemic. RESULTS: Of the 316 participants, a significant proportion regularly used analgesics (45.4%, n = 119), corticosteroids (17.9%, n = 47) and Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs [(NSAIDs) (36.6%, n = 96)]. Two thirds of participants (66.5%, n = 210) did not know their Disease Activity Score-28 (DAS28). Of the remaining third, moderate disease activity (12%, n = 38) was most reported. We found that 16.8% (n = 53) felt their condition was managed well during the pandemic. The remainder felt more negatively. For the newly diagnosed cohort, 34.5% (n = 10) delayed seeking GP help because of COVID-19 concerns. Once assessed, a quarter (24.1%, n = 7) were referred to rheumatology after 4 or more consultations. We found 47% (n = 77) expressed positive opinions on remote consultations, whereas 36% (n = 59) had concerns. The lack of clinical examination (42.5%, n = 25) was flagged. Changing the dynamic from health worker to a patient centred approach was the most wished for improvement (20.3%, n = 64). CONCLUSIONS: Most participants did not know their disease activity status, which is of concern. With a push towards patient-centred and patient-led care, education and supported self-management is critically important. There is high use of NSAIDs and corticosteroids. Pathways of care underwent change with subsequent delays in specialist assessment. The introduction of patient-initiated follow-up (PIFU) and virtual consultations further distances healthcare professionals from patients and could affect outcomes.

Nurses' knowledge and implementation of antimicrobial stewardship and infection prevention strategies in acute paediatric settings.

BACKGROUND: Nurses are the first point of contact for patients and are responsible for monitoring and reporting signs of infection. The COVID-19 pandemic cemented nurses' leadership role in infection prevention. Despite this, nurses' contribution to antimicrobial stewardship initiatives remains under-recognized. AIM: To determine how paediatric nurses understood their role and contribution to antimicrobial stewardship and infection prevention and control practices in three different acute paediatric wards. METHODS: Forty-three nurses were recruited from an adolescent ward, an oncology ward, and a surgical ward in a metropolitan tertiary children's hospital for a qualitative exploratory descriptive study. FINDINGS: Thematic and content analysis derived three themes from the data: understanding of preventable infections; embracing evidence-based guidelines to protect the patient; and roles in preventing and controlling infections and antimicrobial stewardship. Associated subthemes were: desensitized to COVID-19; understanding infection prevention and control precautions; correct use of hospital policy and guidelines; restrictions associated with the use of electronic medical records; understanding of sepsis management and the importance of timely microbiological testing; ambivalence on antimicrobial stewardship roles; and high priority placed on consumer education. CONCLUSION: Nurses' understanding of their role focused on practices such as performing hand hygiene, standard precautions, and reporting the use of high-risk antimicrobials. A lack of understanding of paediatric COVID-19 transmission and presentations was also reported. Education on best practice in infection prevention and AMS was recognized as crucial for both nurses and parents.